Skip to content
The lingwist

The lingwist

The Lingwist is the home for everyone who is passionate about language and linguistics. Feel free to share, discuss, and comment. The Lingwist's motto is " Learn & have fun"

  • Home
  • Discourse Analysis
  • Linguistics
    • Applied Linguistics
    • Core Linguistics
  • Composition
  • English
    • Grammar
    • Vocabulary
    • Functions
      • Previous National exams
  • Privacy Policy!
  • About us
  • Contact Us!
  • Toggle search form
What Is Critical discourse Analysis

What is Critical Discourse Analysis?

Posted on August 13, 2020January 26, 2023 By The Lingwist No Comments on What is Critical Discourse Analysis?

Critical Discourse Analysis or CDA scrutinizes discourse in its social context. It is increasingly becoming an important area in linguistics. Recently, researchers have shown an increased interest in boosting the field as an interdisciplinary approach to critical applied linguistics (Fairclough 1992, 1998. Van Dijk 1998a, 1998b & Wodak 2001, 2002). In this respect, Wodak (2002) believes that the roots of CDA lie in classical rhetoric, semiotics, and sociolinguistics, as well as applied linguistics and pragmatics.

1. What is Critical Discourse Analysis?

According to Bell and Garret (1998), “CDA is best viewed as a shared perspective encompassing a range of approaches rather than just one school” (p. 7). The chief aim of CDA is to unearth ideological and power relations in the discourse or discourses.

To begin with, it is mandatory to provide a precise explanation of what CDA is. Wodak and Meyer (2001) provide a gratifying definition of CDA by stating that:

“CDA may be defined as fundamentally concerned with analyzing opaque as well as transparent structural relationships of dominance, discrimination, power, and control as manifested in language. In other words, CDA aims to investigate critically social inequality as it is expressed, signaled, constituted, and legitimized, and so on by language use (or in discourse).” (p. 2)

Critical Discourse Analysis and Ideology 2 1
Via: Intechopen

Wodak and Meyer show that any language use consists of hidden discourses and CDA’s role is to primarily locate them, and provide a sound examination. It also attempts to bridge the gap between the linguistic, on the one hand, and the social, political, cultural, and historical analyses of texts, on the other. Furthermore, Wodak and Meyer (2001) explain that CDA emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary work in order to gain an appropriate understanding of how language plays a significant role in shaping, transmitting, spreading knowledge, organizing social institutions, and exercising power.

See Also :  Media Discourse and Critical Discourse Analysis

Critical Discourse Analysis and Ideology

Van Dijk’s Framework of Critical Discourse Analysis

Fairclough’s Framework of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA)

CDA is an important theoretical framework of analysis because it investigates both written and spoken text. From the socio-cognitive perspective, Van Dijk (1998a) defines CDA as a field that is chiefly concerned with scrutinizing written and spoken texts to uncover the discursive sources of power, dominance, inequality, and bias in the social and political context. This has been done through stipulating a concise and thorough description, explanation, and critique of how writers ‘naturalize’ discourses by applying textual strategies that suit their aims.

Moreover, Van Dijk strongly believes that it is the socio-cognition and personal cognition that mediate between society and discourse. Within our minds, we give meaning to what is going on in the world. Van Dijk (1991) alternatively prefers to use ‘Critical Discourse Studies (CDS) as an umbrella term to suggest that it is not only a form of analysis but also a ‘critical theory’ with ‘critical applications’. Fairclough (1995), as one of the founders of CDA, accounts for CDA as:

“By CDA I mean discourse analysis which aims to systematically explore often opaque relationships of causality and determination between (a) discursive practices, events and texts, and (b) wider social and cultural structures, relations, and processes; to investigate how such practices, events, and texts arise out of and are ideologically shaped by relations of power and struggles over power; and to explore how the opacity of these relationships between discourse and society is itself a factor securing power and hegemony.” (pp. 132-133)”

Based on the above-mentioned definition, we infer that CDA is concerned with how power relations, dominance, and discursive practices are exercised through language. In addition to power and domination mentioned by Wodak and Van Dijk, Fairclough (1992) argues that the emancipatory agenda of CDA is to unveil the embedded ideologies through analyzing power relations in the text.

CDA also tries to locate the different representations of ideology and how it is operated by people in society. CDA, moreover, aims at examining and criticizing the mechanisms that lead to the emergence of the dominant culture in society. The dominant culture exercises supremacy through language power and inequality. On the basis of the previous claim, language is thus considered an influential means through which specific identities, ideologies, and cultures become dominant in a society.

consulting 2204253 960 720
To conclude, CDA incorporates ideological critique, cognitive, psychological and most importantly linguistic analysis. Additionally, Fairclough and Wodak (1997) provide four fundamental principles of CDA: First, CDA addresses social problems. Second, it does ideological work. Third, it constitutes society as well as culture. Finally, discourse analysis is interpretative and explanatory. As a result, the same communicative event-like text might be construed in various ways by readers and viewers of that particular text relying on their personal experiences, social contexts, and background knowledge. To make it clear, any piece of news, be it spoken or written, is produced and articulated from a rigid ideological framework that is formed by a combination of economic, cultural, and political forces.

Check this article publish: Ideological Interaction Theory in Critical Discourse Analysis

If you like this article, please “Share and care”.

Reference

Bell, A., & Garrett, P. (1998). Approaches to media discourse. Oxford ; Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and      social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. (1995a). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Harlow, UK: Longman. Fairclough, N. (1995b). Media Discourse. London: Arnold

Van Dijk, T.A (1998a). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1988). What is critical discourse analysis? In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin & H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis. (pp. 352-371). Oxford: Blackwell

Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). News, discourse and ideology. Wahl-Jorgensen, K., & Hanitzsch, T. (2009), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 191-230). New York: Routledge.

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: SAGE.

Wodak, R. (2002). What CDA Is about: A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (Eds.). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.

Discourse Analysis Tags:CDA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Fairclough, Foucault, Van Dijk, What is CDA?, What is Critical discourse Analysis?

Post navigation

Previous Post: 4 Myths about language everyone should not believe
Next Post: 5 Best Websites to learn English

Related Posts

  • istockphoto 1290904409 170667a
    Media Discourse and Critical Discourse Analysis Discourse Analysis
  • discourse empty
    Language and Discourse Discourse Analysis
  • Language and Discourse
    Anything you Need to Know about Language and Discourse Analysis Discourse Analysis
  • discourse 1570887140HRFywX
    Fairclough’s Framework of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) Discourse Analysis
  • face 205563 960 720
    Van Dijk’s Framework of Critical Discourse Analysis Discourse Analysis
  • istockphoto 1353298003 170667a
    Critical Discourse Analysis and Ideology 1 Discourse Analysis

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Categories

  • Applied Linguistics
  • Composition
  • Core Linguistics
  • Discourse Analysis
  • English
  • Functions
  • Grammar
  • Uncategorized
  • Vocabulary
  • From Twttr to TikTok: A Comical Look at How Social Media Platforms Got Their Names
  • Say What? The Amazing Story of How Your Brain Select words to Communicate Effectively
  • Don’t Let These 12 Expressions Ruin Your Blind Date: How to Win Over Your Blind Date?
  • The Sound of Personality: How Your Name Can Reflect Who You Are
  • What is Conlang? How Constructed Languages are Changing the Way We Communicate
  • PR
    Most Common Proficiency Exams: which is best for you? English
  • Expository Writing Composition
  • Language and Means of Communication
    Language and means of communication! Applied Linguistics
  • img 5 boredpanda 1494752960
    25 Funny Text Conversations that Will Make you Laugh Applied Linguistics
  • Social Platforms
    From Twttr to TikTok: A Comical Look at How Social Media Platforms Got Their Names English
  • depression anxiety say no
    Stop being shy: 10 different Ways to Say “NO” politely! Applied Linguistics
  • istockphoto 1334281938 170667a
    Irregular Verbs Grammar
  • noname
    20 Most Inspiring Quotes of All Time Everyone Should Know Applied Linguistics

Copyright © 2023 The lingwist.

Powered by PressBook News WordPress theme